Discussion Zone

My take on this fine track. Thanks for listening. Cheers!

It is interesting to observe how the same mix can be interpreted in different ways. I made the sound more intimate, neglecting the volume level. Your mix sounds significantly louder, but as a result, less depth. I tried to arrange the tools less in width and more in the distance. I do not have enough compression on Piano, since I tried to keep dynamic shades. You all sound exactly and probably more correctly. But intimacy is not enough. Maybe I am mistaken. This is a subjective look.
Thank you for work!
https://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/show...#pid116419

(18-03-2022, 08:48 PM)Equilibrium Wrote: [ -> ]It is interesting to observe how the same mix can be interpreted in different ways. I made the sound more intimate, neglecting the volume level. Your mix sounds significantly louder, but as a result, less depth. I tried to arrange the tools less in width and more in the distance. I do not have enough compression on Piano, since I tried to keep dynamic shades. You all sound exactly and probably more correctly. But intimacy is not enough. Maybe I am mistaken. This is a subjective look.
Thank you for work!
https://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/show...#pid116419

Hello Equilibrium! Many thanks for the feedback and I do agree, the feeling of a track is interestingly interpreted so differently for each mixer. I did try different approaches to mix this, but ended up with this. Maybe I'll do another mix later on. Cheers!