Discussion Zone

(22-06-2013, 04:43 PM)Milan Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-04-2013, 07:39 AM)thedon Wrote: [ -> ]My go of this mix ! great vocalist.

If u ask me, I always work oversempling (again record through converters to 88.2 khz 24bit) at the end, i do downsample to 44.1 with Apogee linear dither (white noise) and then export in 16bit 44.1 WAV, and then I convert the file to mp3 converter 320kbps.
U can hear that noise on my track, but i save some bits

Thanks for the advice
will do that from now on !

Hello, nice mix! I also find that you could use a de-esser on the vocals.

(27-06-2013, 09:58 PM)M.W.A.P. Wrote: [ -> ]Hello, nice mix! I also find that you could use a de-esser on the vocals.

Hi

yes will de-ess vocals on another remix
Thank you !

it sounds great to me!

(28-06-2013, 05:11 PM)juanjose1967 Wrote: [ -> ]it sounds great to me!

Thank you

nice and clean.
Don't push the drums like someone else suggested! They're right where they need to be.

I'm working on this one now. I'm spending more time on these drums than I would with other loops I've encountered.
They seem to be three different parts on the same track. Break 'em all up, mix 'em all down. Lots of busy work.
I'm really into mixing her voice.

Good one, man.

(07-07-2013, 06:32 AM)joepalumbo Wrote: [ -> ]nice and clean.
Don't push the drums like someone else suggested! They're right where they need to be.

I'm working on this one now. I'm spending more time on these drums than I would with other loops I've encountered.
They seem to be three different parts on the same track. Break 'em all up, mix 'em all down. Lots of busy work.
I'm really into mixing her voice.

Good one, man.

Thanks Joe , I will have a listen to your mix !

Greetings!
Just popped in to say that the second version is much, much better.
The higher bit rate also prevents the difference channel garble from intruding too much and leaves the high frequencies sounding much cleaner.

Splendid mix!
Dags

Thanks Dags for having another listen and your kind words !