Hold on You - James May - Printable Version +- Discussion Zone (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com) +-- Forum: 'Mixing Secrets' Free Multitrack Download Library: mixing forum (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=184) +--- Forum: Acoustic, Jazz, Country, Orchestral (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: James May: 'Hold On You' (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=321) +---- Thread: Hold on You - James May (/showthread.php?tid=18561) |
Hold on You - James May - muthomi - 29-03-2017 I enjoyed this song's groove while mixing, superb recordings, and that slide guitar ... too slick I welcome your feedback on this mix. Muthomi RE: Hold on You - James May - Obelix - 30-03-2017 Overall, good sounding mix. Snare drum in this song was the though one. A little bit more low end on bass , and thats it. RE: Hold on You - James May - muthomi - 31-03-2017 (30-03-2017, 09:21 PM)Obelix Wrote: Overall, good sounding mix. Snare drum in this song was the though one. A little bit more low end on bass , and thats it. Thanks Obelix for giving it a listen. I didn't quite understand your comment regarding the snare, kindly clarify when you have a moment. Regarding the bass, I will add some low end on bass and see what that sounds like. I mixed this on headphones and I don't have studio monitors speakers at the moment. When it came to listening it over the apple earpods it came across as too boomy and dark. Any ideas with that? RE: Hold on You - James May - Dangerous - 31-03-2017 Hi Muthomi, Listening to your mix, in it's own right, I think it stands up pretty well, There are although, some tonal issues that I think probably relate back to your use of headphones for the mixing purpose. The main issue for me is a strong build up in the low mids region up to the 500hz mark that's really clouding the mix over. I have added a version of your track that I've eq-ed a bit to try and balance things up for comparison. I found a -6dB shelving cut up to 530hz with a slight boost at 65hz helped matters. I also removed some harshness at 965hz ,2400hz and 10khz which become apparent when the mids were cleaned up. This is just a rough attempt at correction using my headphones and macbook whist sitting on the couch, so it's far from perfect, but I think you'll get the point. Besides these tonal balance moves are best applied to the individual tracks within the mixing session. I hope this helps, The mix otherwise is pretty good. Referencing your mix with commercial tracks would be beneficial in this respect. Dave RE: Hold on You - James May - muthomi - 04-04-2017 Dave, Thanks for the recommendations from last week. I went back to the mix and made another attempt to correct the problems you mentioned. I have attached new mix below. Let me know if it has actually improved. As for referencing to similar songs, I will definitely look more into that. Sam |