15-08-2015, 05:35 AM
Here is Version 1
Please Help Mike Keep This Awesome Educational Site Alive And Become A patron !
https://www.patreon.com/CambridgeMT/posts
I Am Cassettes: 'Believe'
|
15-08-2015, 05:35 AM
Here is Version 1
Please Help Mike Keep This Awesome Educational Site Alive And Become A patron ! https://www.patreon.com/CambridgeMT/posts
19-08-2015, 12:54 PM
Nice mix ! Maybe the strings in the bridge could have been a bit more in front.
Good job !
Nice mix Don, but I feel like the Harp is too far up front when it's in. I could do with a little more low end energy from the bass. Now, obviously, these are completely subjective. It's a clean mix. The guitar at the end seems a touch too hot, too.
Nice job. Draper
20-08-2015, 01:12 AM
(19-08-2015, 12:54 PM)Mandubien Wrote: Nice mix ! Maybe the strings in the bridge could have been a bit more in front.Hi ,I agree the strings are getting lost in the bridge ! Thanks Please Help Mike Keep This Awesome Educational Site Alive And Become A patron ! https://www.patreon.com/CambridgeMT/posts
20-08-2015, 01:21 AM
(19-08-2015, 04:22 PM)loweche6 Wrote: Nice mix Don, but I feel like the Harp is too far up front when it's in. I could do with a little more low end energy from the bass. Now, obviously, these are completely subjective. It's a clean mix. The guitar at the end seems a touch too hot, too. Hi ,Draper I agree the harp is too loud and the bass is too soft,little more work on automation with the guitars i can also hear some frequency masking with guitars and cymbals i also need to sort out. Thanks . Please Help Mike Keep This Awesome Educational Site Alive And Become A patron ! https://www.patreon.com/CambridgeMT/posts
20-08-2015, 04:49 PM
What a great mix! No need for version 2. Sounds balanced to me.
I think interaction between cymbals and acoustic guitar is great. Vox float nicely above music. I agree with Draper. THe end guitar comes quite loud.
21-08-2015, 07:39 AM
Can't say I noticed any of the problems pointed out above except the low end, just needs more weight and definition in the kick maybe? Think the bass is fine. Also, maybe cos I'm tired but thought the mix a little harsh. Drums and lead voc in particular, I know the voc was too harsh to begin with and the overheads and room mics were trashy but just think the upper mids could be tamed a little in general. A lot going on there, ...dunno, long day! However, the rest of it sounds great, getting nice and epic which is what it needs and not easy to achieve.
21-08-2015, 08:31 AM
(20-08-2015, 04:49 PM)Olli H Wrote: What a great mix! No need for version 2. Sounds balanced to me.Thanks Olli Please Help Mike Keep This Awesome Educational Site Alive And Become A patron ! https://www.patreon.com/CambridgeMT/posts
21-08-2015, 08:32 AM
(21-08-2015, 07:39 AM)manuke Wrote: Can't say I noticed any of the problems pointed out above except the low end, just needs more weight and definition in the kick maybe? Think the bass is fine. Also, maybe cos I'm tired but thought the mix a little harsh. Drums and lead voc in particular, I know the voc was too harsh to begin with and the overheads and room mics were trashy but just think the upper mids could be tamed a little in general. A lot going on there, ...dunno, long day! However, the rest of it sounds great, getting nice and epic which is what it needs and not easy to achieve. Thanks for the feedback Please Help Mike Keep This Awesome Educational Site Alive And Become A patron ! https://www.patreon.com/CambridgeMT/posts
21-08-2015, 05:26 PM
I like your mix the way it is. Only a little bit more of kick/bass definition like Manuke pointed out before. Good job!!
mixing since April 2013
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|