02-06-2016, 06:02 PM
Thank you for the quotation.
I remix the track and i did something different. I split the signal in two different tracks and then summing them into a third one.The first has the low rumble (sub) and the other the upper mid frequencies and i've use m/s eq and comp for keeping the things in place.
I think that now sits better than the previous mix.
I am glad to have your opinion. A second opinion is a must.
Best regards,
Nikos Glk
I remix the track and i did something different. I split the signal in two different tracks and then summing them into a third one.The first has the low rumble (sub) and the other the upper mid frequencies and i've use m/s eq and comp for keeping the things in place.
I think that now sits better than the previous mix.
I am glad to have your opinion. A second opinion is a must.
Best regards,
Nikos Glk
(25-05-2016, 06:13 AM)azwayne Wrote: It might be worth your time to read through the writeup that Mike did on this track. The issue is not a matter of volume so much as it is, "there's something fishy around here." I forget how he dealt with it but the problem is one of the synth kicks. What I did was to split the difference on timing and pull it a tad ahead. For me, that seemed to get it to fit in pretty well but I think Mike's approach was probably the better one.