(15-12-2012, 10:02 AM)Mike Senior Wrote: Not really able to listen at the moment, but I just wanted to say that the way you write about what you're doing has such a great attitude -- a questioning mindset which accepts the necessity of compromises and balances them against each other for the best overall result. I'll try to have a listen to this when I do my next splurge in the New Year.
(16-12-2012, 11:42 AM)Jamolir Wrote: [...]You really nailed the banjo sound, love it!
I think the kick could be a bit more present with a little top end added.
In todays radio world I think it could have been some more 2-3k overall but nice job indeed! [...]
You raise an interesting point: I never thought about any audience. I intuitively mixed that for myself, for the mood that I wanted this song to bring to me. At this particular time. But I never reflected this, until now.
And this me!-me!-me!-ishness is why I actually tried to dull down the drums and especially un-transient the kick. I wanted the groove to come from the banjo, for example
But I may have gone too far, as it may happen with every overly deliberate decision. I'll have an eye on it!(15-12-2012, 09:54 PM)uzilevi Wrote: hi the phonk's its nice but its to bright i made me lower the volume.
i think the vocals are to bright he have alot of low's but you took them out . also on the second a part i think the track jast need a lift.
you can listen to my mix and hear what i mean.
soory uzi
Hm... to be honest, I have a hard time following you here. As for the vocals, I don't see a great difference in brightness between your mix and mine, as demonstrated in the file below (the duller bits are mine, the more spacious bits are yours). And what kind of "lift" would you suggest? I cannot see that from your mix either.
Thanks to all of you for your feedback!
Marc