08-11-2013, 11:36 AM
Thanks for listening
Interesting point. I haven't never thought about that. And it applies almost to any music made in 60's: stereo mix is not "realistic" but the feel of performance is great. And at the same time in many modern mixes the mix may be "realistic" but the perfomance doesn't feel real.
In this case drums were samples. Maybe the mono mix of drums masks their real nature. I also blurred them to make them sound even more as one instrument instead of many separate instruments.
And I didn't even dare to go to the similar volume and brightness levels that CCR uses in their cowbell tracks ...![Smile Smile](https://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
(08-11-2013, 10:04 AM)Artbass Wrote: What I like about this mix is the panning. Because it is nowhere near realism but it still feels like one performance (which I guess it not even is, though I might be wrong).
Interesting point. I haven't never thought about that. And it applies almost to any music made in 60's: stereo mix is not "realistic" but the feel of performance is great. And at the same time in many modern mixes the mix may be "realistic" but the perfomance doesn't feel real.
In this case drums were samples. Maybe the mono mix of drums masks their real nature. I also blurred them to make them sound even more as one instrument instead of many separate instruments.
(08-11-2013, 10:04 AM)Artbass Wrote: Cowbell levels are always up to discussion, though
And I didn't even dare to go to the similar volume and brightness levels that CCR uses in their cowbell tracks ...
![Smile Smile](https://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)