Triviul, alright? mix 2 - Printable Version +- Discussion Zone (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com) +-- Forum: 'Mixing Secrets' Free Multitrack Download Library: mixing forum (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=184) +--- Forum: Pop, Singer-Songwriter (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: Triviul: 'Alright?' (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=347) +---- Thread: Triviul, alright? mix 2 (/showthread.php?tid=15844) |
Triviul, alright? mix 2 - Cudjoe - 16-07-2016 Some very good and interesting mixes of this track here,this is my take on it what do you guys think? RE: Triviul, alright? mix 2 - Cudjoe - 18-07-2016 Thought i would do a mix 2 with less drums processing and less LR panning of vocals,any comments? RE: Triviul, alright? mix 2 - Dangerous - 18-07-2016 I think I prefer #2 mix Cudjoe. I like the more centred vocals and the snare seems to sit better. Overall it sounds a little more cohesive to me. Very Nice. Dave RE: Triviul, alright? mix 2 - Cudjoe - 18-07-2016 (18-07-2016, 02:12 PM)Dangerous Wrote: I think I prefer #2 mix Cudjoe. I like the more centred vocals and the snare seems to sit better. Overall it sounds a little more cohesive to me. Very Nice.Thanks Dave I must admit that I prefer mix 2 as well, mix 1 was more of trying a different approach with the LR panning on the vocals so thanks again. RE: Triviul, alright? mix 2 - TChianit - 04-08-2016 HI Cudjoe, Nice balances. I prefer a little less on the effects but that's just my taste. Nice sounds and balances. My vote was for number two also. T |