+- Discussion Zone (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com)
+-- Forum: 'Mixing Secrets' Free Multitrack Download Library: mixing forum (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=184)
+--- Forum: Pop, Singer-Songwriter (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Forum: Fredy V: 'Not Alone' (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=331)
+---- Thread: Fun redefined (/showthread.php?tid=14378)
Fun redefined - Lammy - 18-03-2016
Throwing in my mix version.
Nothing relevant to report. Just a lot of fun in playing with this mix.
Automation at a later stage.
cheers
RE: Fun redefined - Lammy - 10-05-2016
Replaced with a far better balanced version
cheers
RE: Fun redefined - Aresfin - 11-05-2016
looked liked you had some overs.
RE: Fun redefined - Lammy - 11-05-2016
(11-05-2016, 04:34 AM)Aresfin Wrote: looked liked you had some overs.
thanks, but sorry I don't get this. Not an English mother tongue. You mean too much overheads? Or you intend it looks like I had an hangover while mixing this? ;-)
cheers
RE: Fun redefined - Konek - 11-05-2016
Hi Lammy! That's really fine work!
It's seemed to me that Slash met Lionel
When I start to mixing this, I'll call Benson)))
RE: Fun redefined - Lammy - 16-05-2016
(11-05-2016, 11:06 PM)Konek Wrote: Hi Lammy! That's really fine work!
It's seemed to me that Slash met Lionel
When I start to mixing this, I'll call Benson)))
Thanks very much, I'm listening after ear rest and there are a few flaws I'll try to correct:
- snare a little too wet and a little too loud - or transient not properly tamed
- other details that are not pleasing 100% (back vocs, overheads...) where improvements can be done.
Maybe a proper mastering session would help.
Not qualified to mix Richie or Hudson ;-)
RE: Fun redefined - Aresfin - 20-05-2016
(11-05-2016, 11:40 AM)Lammy Wrote:(11-05-2016, 04:34 AM)Aresfin Wrote: looked liked you had some overs.
thanks, but sorry I don't get this. Not an English mother tongue. You mean too much overheads? Or you intend it looks like I had an hangover while mixing this? ;-)
cheers
no, I mean on the mix bus output, it's clipping.
RE: Fun redefined - Lammy - 16-06-2016
(20-05-2016, 06:35 AM)Aresfin Wrote: no, I mean on the mix bus output, it's clipping.
I see what you mean now. It doesn't matter. Busses are 64 bit mixer processing in plugin-to-plugin transfer and summing, and 32 bit in internal rtas plugin processing. with plenty of headroom. Scaling down to 24 bit is done at master fader transfer point.
That means: during mixing, in general, if busses are just "touching red" and master tracks are not red, all is good in Protools 10.
cheers