Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
<<< Sweet Eliza Jane - New Version 5 >>>
#10
Hello,

I listened briefly to mix 2.

Regarding the count-in, what was your reasoning behind it appearing only in one channel? Do you also think it could be louder, especially for an audience listening at low level with a high background noise (levels of up to -50dB can be pretty common, even in domestic surroundings)? Thinking about it, does it's inclusion add to the concept of the song, especially in context of a studio-type production as against a live performance?

Are you not finding this busy?

How did you envisage differentiating the verses and choruses musically and instrumentally? How did you plan to help keep listeners engaged for the duration of a relatively long song?

I recommend you back off from the limiter, you appear to be pushing it hard on occasion because I can hear distortion. Why the need to limit to 0dB?

Love your LED layout in the avatar. Out of interest, what size are the screens?

Thanks for the listen too
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Sweet Eliza Jane - by Dangerous - 22-06-2017, 12:57 PM
RE: Sweet Eliza Jane - by Mixinthecloud - 22-06-2017, 01:01 PM
RE: Sweet Eliza Jane - by nickfrom - 22-06-2017, 07:00 PM
RE: Sweet Eliza Jane - by Mixinthecloud - 23-06-2017, 12:08 PM
RE: Sweet Eliza Jane - by thedon - 23-06-2017, 08:33 AM
RE: Sweet Eliza Jane - by L.Mix - 23-06-2017, 01:29 PM
RE: Sweet Eliza Jane - by Mixinthecloud - 23-06-2017, 02:32 PM
RE: Sweet Eliza Jane Now with Version 2 UPDATE - by Max Headroom - 25-06-2017, 11:38 AM
RE: Sweet Eliza Jane - New Version 3 - by lm425 - 27-03-2018, 11:19 PM