Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
James May 'Eliza Jane'
#8
(10-04-2017, 01:26 PM)Olli H Wrote: I listened version 2

Overall sound very nice and full, it’s balanced and everything.

Esses and effes quite loud. Well, I guess everybody has that problem with these multitracks, but in this case it disturbs the listening.

One tricky task to test: ask the singer to take a one step aback away from the microphone, but try to keep the vox dry sounding without audible reverb.

Thanks Olli, yes it's a tough one. I think it's probably best left fairly natural sound without trying to emphasis the highs to much. Still, they are lovely sounding raw tracks.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Dangerous - 09-04-2017, 12:27 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Roy - 09-04-2017, 01:31 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Dangerous - 10-04-2017, 12:48 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Damian Oakes - 09-04-2017, 08:49 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Dangerous - 10-04-2017, 12:52 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Olli H - 10-04-2017, 01:26 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Dangerous - 12-04-2017, 12:28 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by HbGuitar - 11-04-2017, 05:28 AM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Dangerous - 12-04-2017, 12:39 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Max Headroom - 12-04-2017, 03:40 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by thedon - 13-04-2017, 10:44 AM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Dangerous - 17-04-2017, 12:54 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Dangerous - 17-04-2017, 12:47 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Mixinthecloud - 21-06-2017, 07:13 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Mixinthecloud - 21-06-2017, 07:20 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Dangerous - 22-06-2017, 12:15 PM
RE: James May 'Eliza Jane' - by Mixinthecloud - 22-06-2017, 12:40 PM