07-02-2016, 01:49 PM
yo JJ,
i love the timbre you achieve in your mixes....
the biggie with this multi, is achieving an illusion of depth and space (including height) between the piano and the singers, and with the listener. listening critically to the piano during the introduction, i felt the spacial cues didn't fit the singer's, raising some ambiguity to the listening experience. we are all going to find this a massive challenge.
there's another factor, associated with this which made it a fascinating project for me, which was the different "loudness" of the piano vs the loudness of the singers.....as well as the treble content (treble being another factor, along with loudness) which helps us assess distance (i.e. direct sound vs early and late reflections) between the "instruments"
how about mixing it using NX and see what you get? it would be interesting to hear the differences with an A/B.
it was interesting to hear your take on the placement of the voices.
i love the timbre you achieve in your mixes....
the biggie with this multi, is achieving an illusion of depth and space (including height) between the piano and the singers, and with the listener. listening critically to the piano during the introduction, i felt the spacial cues didn't fit the singer's, raising some ambiguity to the listening experience. we are all going to find this a massive challenge.
there's another factor, associated with this which made it a fascinating project for me, which was the different "loudness" of the piano vs the loudness of the singers.....as well as the treble content (treble being another factor, along with loudness) which helps us assess distance (i.e. direct sound vs early and late reflections) between the "instruments"
how about mixing it using NX and see what you get? it would be interesting to hear the differences with an A/B.
it was interesting to hear your take on the placement of the voices.
Beware...........Cognitive Dissonance!