Alright

[The_Metallurgist]

Brought the bass up, I hope it isn't too much now. . . .

what would make a difference in the bass is avoiding stereo, and instead balancing the power equally between two boxes in mono. you could then drive the mix much harder in the low end without the speakers breaking out in a sweat. i'd personally mono down from 200Hz, into full mono at 100Hz - generally. if you want some bass weirdness, try working it in the higher part of the spectrum out of the way of the low mids, it gives more options like creating some movement. i wouldn't advise feeding anything below 100Hz into your stereo verb, eh? if you wanted a sense of depth on the sub 100Hz bass....it's better to keep the verb mono.

on the subject of verbs, there's some obvious congestion stacking up in many places; if you focus your ears to search for it's issues, i'm sure you'll spot it too. EQ or duck it, or both....or leave it as a creative or taste thangg. woteva.

i was pleased to hear you didn't amp-up the loudness war which proliferates on the forum....and went gently on the master buss. the mix suggests some evidence of fairly heavy downward compression though, i'll assume it was applied intentionally for "creative" purposes?

i found the LV's slightly off centre placement towards the left a distraction in the cans (eg 0:40'ish, i'm sometimes a victim of conditioning and expectations! lol), but i loved your no-holds-barred approach elsewhere. Look out Flaming Lips, i say!