+- Discussion Zone (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com)
+-- Forum: 'Mixing Secrets' Free Multitrack Download Library: mixing forum (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=184)
+--- Forum: Pop, Singer-Songwriter (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Forum: Starnes & Shah: 'Prodigal Son' (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=487)
+---- Thread: Prodigal Son - gloukin mix (/showthread.php?tid=27018)
Prodigal Son - gloukin mix - glukin - 09-04-2019
Here is my quick mix, let me know how it sounds. Thanks!
V2 updated based on Roy's observations.
RE: Prodigal Son - gloukin mix - Roy - 09-04-2019
The mix works fine. The snare ring stands out to me. It's not so bad/noticeable as the song goes on but it's there straight away at the top and stick out. The guitar in the b-verse (gtr 2, I think) is loud. As is guitar 4. I like the aggressive push that guitar 4 brings but it might be over the top at the moment. The lead vocal could come up a little but isn't bad where it is.
Hope that helps.
RE: Prodigal Son - gloukin mix - glukin - 10-04-2019
(09-04-2019, 04:31 PM)RoyMatthews Wrote: The mix works fine. The snare ring stands out to me. It's not so bad/noticeable as the song goes on but it's there straight away at the top and stick out. The guitar in the b-verse (gtr 2, I think) is loud. As is guitar 4. I like the aggressive push that guitar 4 brings but it might be over the top at the moment. The lead vocal could come up a little but isn't bad where it is.
Hope that helps.
Thank you, Roy. I updated the mix based on the above. I wanted the snare to ring, it brings character to the piece in my opinion.
RE: Prodigal Son - gloukin mix - Roy - 10-04-2019
The second mix definitely feels better.