James May: 'Hold On You' - Printable Version +- Discussion Zone (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com) +-- Forum: 'Mixing Secrets' Free Multitrack Download Library: mixing forum (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=184) +--- Forum: Acoustic, Jazz, Country, Orchestral (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: James May: 'Hold On You' (http://discussion.cambridge-mt.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=321) +---- Thread: James May: 'Hold On You' (/showthread.php?tid=13970) |
James May: 'Hold On You' - takka360 - 17-02-2016 New mix, RE: James May: 'Hold On You' - Shul - 18-02-2016 Hello takka You have good balance and even though everything feels like in the centered I can hear everything. Only thing I would like is a bit more brightness overall. But this sounds good. In comparison with other mixes I think for this particular "mono" feel makes it feel bigger. RE: James May: 'Hold On You' - takka360 - 18-02-2016 The only thing panned is the acoustic guitar that I had to double RE: James May: 'Hold On You' - Shul - 18-02-2016 did you put a mini delay on one of the acoustic guitar track to spread? I'm asking because I hear the acoustic guitar as if it was mono. I do hear the overheads hard panned though but that's about the only thing I hear hard panned. RE: James May: 'Hold On You' - takka360 - 18-02-2016 no I wanted to keep as is,i was also going for depth more really RE: James May: 'Hold On You' - Shul - 18-02-2016 (18-02-2016, 07:27 AM)takka360 Wrote: no I wanted to keep as is,i was also going for depth more really Oh ok. Yeah the mix definitely feels big |